Group Six
From HihiWiki
- Group Six is: Adam, Chris R, Jack, Kyle, and Steve.
- Style's Chapter 5. Coherence I summarized on HihiWiki.
- Style's Chapter 8. Length applied to Twitter.
Contents |
October 14, 2009
- Edited five individually written word documents about Coherence I while playing a five person game of musical chairs.
- Uploaded all five, multi-edited sections on Coherence I to Hihiwiki as a single wiki document.
October 15, 2009
- Noted Group Six authorship for the initial state of the wiki.
- Added bold text to titles, subtitles and numbers.
- Added italics to the title Style for emphasis.
- Added spaces between paragraphs for easier on-line reading.
- Added horizontal lines to clearly divide sections.
- Noted future Twitter application of Style.
- Added URL's of relevant web pages in External Links section.
October 16, 2009
- Added URL links from HihiWiki to the Twitter accounts of Group Six.
- Added a hyperlink on Coherence I page to Group Six page.
- Added URL links on Group Six page connecting to Coherence I and Length pages.
- Added contents box to Coherence I page.
October 19, 2009
- Talked about what to do with Chapter 8. Length.
- Added horizontal lines to Length page to clearly define sections.
- Added contents box to Length page.
- Added a brief introduction to Coherence I page.
- Read and edited Coherence I, one more time.
- Added Twitter URL to External Links.
October 21, 2009
- Added URL link to EMU website.
- Added URL link to ENGL 328 page.
- Added contents box to Group Six page.
- Uploaded and edited Length application to Twitter.
- Final edits of Group Six wiki.
- Edited Group One's Length chapter summary section.
- Edited Group Four's Coherence I application to Twitter section.
Performance Evaluation
We ask to be evaluated according to this ratio:
- Your evaluation of Group Six product/process: 40%
- Your evaluation of your own product/process: 40%
- My evaluation of Group Six product/process: 10%
- My evaluation of your own product/process: 10%
We will apply this criteria for the work done by Group Six:
- Reflects a command of selected principles from Style, as established by thorough grasp of Williams' work in the summary portion (audience and purpose)
- Wholeness (the project is complete; all aspects are available)
- Illustrative examples (concrete examples, vivid language)
- Organization (sequencing)
- Visual effectiveness (look and design of page)
- Accuracy (concerning mistakes or errors)
We will evaluate each criterion listed above using this scale:
<NA----------NI----------AC----------EX>
- EX: Exceptional. The writer has applied the criterion with distinction.
- AC: Acceptable/meets expectations. The writer has applied the criterion to a satisfactory degree.
- NI: Needs improvement. The writer has minimally applied the criterion in the project.
- NA: Not applied. The writer has not applied the criterion in the project.
