Group Four

Category: Groups

Group Name

• Group members: Mark, Karla, Anne, Rachel
• Chapter we are summarizing: Chapter 7
• Chapter we are extending to Twitter: Chapter 4

Group Statement on Evaluation

We ask to be evaluated according to the following distribution:
Your evaluation of group product/process: 40%
Your evaluation of your own product/process: 40%
My evaluation of group product/process: 10%
My evaluation of your own product/process: 10%

We are applying the following evaluation criteria for the overall product produced by the group:

If you decide as a group to incorporate them, Project 2 may be evaluated according to any of the following criteria:

• Reflects a command of selected principles from Style, as established by thorough grasp of Williams' work in the summary portion (audience and purpose)
• Wholeness (the project is complete; all aspects are available)
• Illustrative examples (concrete examples, vivid language)
• Organization (sequencing)
• Visual effectiveness (look and design of page)
• Accuracy (concerning mistakes or errors)

Each criterion listed above may be evaluated on the following scale, if you choose to explain it in this way:

<NA----------NI----------AC----------EX>

• EX: Exceptional. The writer has applied the criterion with distinction.
• AC: Acceptable/meets expectations. The writer has applied the criterion to a satisfactory degree.
• NI: Needs improvement. The writer has minimally applied the criterion in the project.
• NA: Not applied. The writer has not applied the criterion in the project.