Group Eight
From HihiWiki
Group Name
- Dana, Danae, Julia, Justin, and Jerime.
- We are summarizing Chapter 4. Emphasis.
- We are extending Chapter Concision to Twitter.
Group Statement on Evaluation
We ask to be evaluated according to the following distribution:
Your evaluation of group product/process: 40%
Your evaluation of your own product/process: 40%
My evaluation of group product/process: 10%
My evaluation of your own product/process: 10%
We are applying the following evaluation criteria for the overall product produced by the group:
If you decide as a group to incorporate them, Project 2 may be evaluated according to any of the following criteria:
- Reflects a command of selected principles from Style, as established by thorough grasp of Williams' work in the summary portion (audience and purpose)
- Wholeness (the project is complete; all aspects are available)
- Illustrative examples (concrete examples, vivid language)
- Organization (sequencing)
- Visual effectiveness (look and design of page)
- Accuracy (concerning mistakes or errors)
Each criterion listed above may be evaluated on the following scale, if you choose to explain it in this way:
<NA----------NI----------AC----------EX>
- EX: Exceptional. The writer has applied the criterion with distinction.
- AC: Acceptable/meets expectations. The writer has applied the criterion to a satisfactory degree.
- NI: Needs improvement. The writer has minimally applied the criterion in the project.
- NA: Not applied. The writer has not applied the criterion in the project.
